To the Editor:
Re “Biden’s ‘Regret’ for Hill’s Pain Fails to Soothe” (front page, April 26):
In 1991, many of us were glued to our TVs as a Senate panel led by Joe Biden grilled Anita Hill as she testified during a confirmation hearing for Clarence Thomas. Mr. Biden’s conduct and that of the panel were deeply disturbing and helped give us one of the most regressive justices in Supreme Court history.
It seems almost unforgivable until we recognize that if nominated, Mr. Biden will be running against President Trump.
Any candidate with a long record in public service has a record with mistakes. The question is whether he or she has grown from those mistakes or dug in deeper. There is nothing in Mr. Trump's record to suggest that his treatment of people of color, immigrants or women has evolved.
Mr. Biden is correct when he says that the character of the nation would be fundamentally altered if Mr. Trump wins a second term. In 2020, we won’t cast a vote for a perfect person no matter who wins the Democratic nomination. We can, however, vote for someone who believes he or she serves the public rather than the opposite.
Elliott MillerBala Cynwyd, Pa.
To the Editor:
The discussion regarding Joe Biden’s handling of the Anita Hill hearings often misses the point. The catastrophic outcome was the permanent seat on the Supreme Court for Clarence Thomas. Justice Thomas has been a disaster for civil rights, voting rights, workers’ rights, L.G.B.T.Q. rights, immigrant rights, patient rights, gun control, environmental protections and the ability of women to control their own bodies.
Justice Thomas is the worst outcome of Joe and the boys running the Judiciary Committee hearings back in the ’90s. Anita Hill was collateral damage, along with the other female witnesses denied the opportunity to corroborate her report of Mr. Thomas’s sexual harassment.
Clarence Thomas should have never been given the privilege to serve on the Supreme Court, and if Joe Biden had done his due diligence, perhaps he wouldn’t be on the bench right now.
Eileen ReddenSouth Windsor, Conn.
To the Editor:
It is telling that after 28 years, Joe Biden reached out to Anita Hill only when he was essentially forced to by the #MeToo movement and his desire to be president. Also telling are the exact words of the speech in March in which Mr. Biden seemed to express regret over his role in Anita Hill’s testimony.
Mr. Biden didn’t say he failed to give Ms. Hill the kind of hearing she deserved; he said he “couldn’t” give her such a hearing, thus hinting at some sort of force he was powerless to stop.
Twenty-eight years after his brutish treatment of Anita Hill, Joe Biden still hasn’t taken full responsibility for his shameful behavior.
Lawrence ReichardBelfast, Me.
To the Editor:
Every presidential candidate is flawed, but the attacks on Joe Biden’s years in the Senate, from Anita Hill to his opposition to busing, raise an interesting question: If his Senate record was good enough for Barack Obama to select him as his vice president, why isn’t that good enough for us?
Martin TolchinWashingtonThe writer is a former congressional correspondent for The New York Times.B:?
【瑾】【儀】【被】【記】【在】【名】【下】【的】【消】【息】【同】【樣】【傳】【到】【了】【二】【房】。 【秀】【姨】【娘】【輕】【輕】【的】【撫】【摸】【著】【慧】【姐】【兒】【的】【黑】【發】，【喃】【喃】【道】，“【我】【的】【慧】【兒】【想】【不】【想】【記】【在】【太】【太】【名】【下】？” 【慧】【姐】【兒】【抬】【起】【頭】，“【記】【在】【太】【太】【名】【下】，【和】【不】【記】【在】【太】【太】【名】【下】，【有】【什】【么】【區】【別】【嗎】？” 【她】【年】【級】【小】，【對】【這】【些】【只】【有】【一】【些】【朦】【朧】【的】【概】【念】。 “【記】【在】【太】【太】【名】【下】，【日】【后】【就】【和】【寶】【姐】【兒】【一】【樣】【風】【光】【了】?！薄拘恪俊疽獺俊灸鎩?/p>
【雖】【然】【在】【張】【掖】【安】【營】【扎】【寨】，【但】【是】【對】【于】【關】【山】【老】【人】【的】【尋】【找】【始】【終】【沒】【有】【?！俊局埂俊靜健俊痙ァ?。 【對】【于】【慕】【云】【澤】【他】【們】【選】【擇】【在】【河】【邊】【駐】【扎】，【當】【地】【居】【民】【表】【示】【很】【滿】【意】，【他】【們】【沒】【有】【人】【?！俊就俊居小俊灸啊俊舊俊救恕俊敬場俊窘俊舅俊久恰俊鏡摹俊鏡亍俊九獺?。 【慕】【云】【澤】【帶】【著】【月】【琉】【璃】【偶】【爾】【也】【進】【城】【打】【聽】【關】【于】【關】【山】【老】【人】【的】【消】【息】，【城】【鎮】【的】【居】【民】【都】【很】【淳】【樸】，【一】【聽】【說】【是】【為】【了】【找】【關】【山】【老】【人】【看】【病】，【都】【很】【積】【極】【的】【告】【訴】【他】【們】。
【縹】【緲】【人】【間】【完】【結】【了】。 【來】【得】【匆】【忙】，【去】【得】【也】【很】【匆】【匆】。 【篇】【幅】【就】【這】【么】【多】，【有】【些】【坑】【注】【定】【沒】【法】【填】，【有】【很】【多】【預】【設】【的】【想】【法】，【注】【定】【沒】【法】【體】【現】【出】【來】，【有】【些】【方】【面】，【也】【確】【實】【沒】【法】【兼】【顧】【了】。 【抱】【歉】！ 【這】【個】【時】【候】【完】【結】，【也】【是】【情】【非】【得】【已】?！救俊舅摹俊臼俊鏡摹俊揪俊徑?，【一】【個】【月】【三】【千】【塊】【錢】（【貴】【陽】【市】【最】【低】【工】【資】【標】【準】【一】【千】【五】【百】【多】【了】，(-???-???-???
【眾】【人】【凝】【神】【一】【看】，【喬】【小】【箐】【好】【端】【端】【地】【站】【在】【場】【地】【中】【間】，【那】【魏】【大】【賢】【面】【如】【白】【紙】【躺】【在】【地】【上】，【氣】【息】【微】【弱】，【眼】【看】【不】【救】【治】，【絕】【對】【有】【死】【亡】【的】【?！俊鞠鍘?。 【白】【千】【羽】【目】【光】【里】【殺】【氣】【騰】【騰】，【猶】【如】【一】【把】【鋒】【利】【的】【寶】【?！?，【直】【插】【地】【面】。 【喬】【小】【箐】【目】【光】【深】【處】【流】【露】【出】【一】【抹】【驚】【喜】，【呆】【呆】【地】【看】【著】【他】，【嘴】【唇】【蠕】【動】【了】【幾】【下】，【道】：“【你】【終】【于】【來】【了】！” 【白】【千】【羽】【滿】【臉】【歉】【意】，【溫】【柔】【道】北斗星3d彩票高手论坛“【好】?！敬蟆俊凈鎩俊拘 俊拘摹俊鏡恪??！鞠取俊究礎俊究礎俊竟幀俊疚鎩俊駒凇俊灸摹??！?【沐】【言】【早】【就】【在】【那】【驚】【恐】【聲】【里】【警】【戒】【起】【來】，【看】【著】【四】【周】?！靜弧俊徑浴俊揪ⅰ?，【很】【不】【對】【勁】?！菊狻俊糾鎩俊境俊玖恕俊舅俊久恰俊菊狻俊拘俊救恕俊鏡摹俊舊俊疽簟俊揪印俊救弧俊揪汀俊久弧俊酒洹俊舅俊舊俊疽簟俊玖恕??！俱濉俊狙浴俊狙邸俊舊瘛俊疽弧俊玖蕁?，【抓】【緊】【了】【天】【隕】。 【忽】【然】【一】【道】【黑】【影】【閃】【過】，【沐】【言】【?！俊競俊鏡摹俊究礎俊鏡健俊競謾俊鞠瘛俊臼恰俊咎酢俊竟貳?。 “【大】【家】【小】【心】，【好】【像】【是】【條】【喪】【尸】【狗】?！薄景佟俊咎俊敬蟆俊舊俊舅怠?，【眾】【人】【聚】【在】【一】【起】
“【你】【知】【道】【我】【那】【手】【機】【里】【多】【少】JS【機】【密】【么】，【等】【著】【挨】【槍】【子】【兒】【吧】【你】！” 【趙】【小】【南】【被】【偷】【了】【手】【機】，【老】【臉】【有】【些】【掛】【不】【住】，【惱】【羞】【成】【怒】【之】【下】，【對】【著】【那】【偷】【兒】【的】【腦】【殼】【就】【是】【幾】【巴】【掌】。 【那】【偷】【兒】【一】【看】【就】【是】【個】【老】【手】，【被】【抓】【了】【之】【后】【并】【不】【如】【何】【害】【怕】，【反】【而】【還】【嬉】【皮】【笑】【臉】【道】： “【便】【衣】【就】【便】【衣】，【警】【官】【您】【可】【別】【嚇】【?！俊疚搖?，【什】【么】js【機】【密】【啊】，【您】【身】【上】【就】【沒】【有】【半】【點】【就】*
“【什】【么】【辦】【法】？”【江】【月】【初】【下】【意】【識】【的】【問】。 【風】【澈】【正】【要】【說】【話】，【卻】【突】【然】【來】【一】【個】【人】，【嘿】【嘿】【一】【笑】，“【喲】，【二】【位】【小】【友】，【巧】【啊】，【又】【見】【面】【了】，【你】【們】【也】【來】【喝】【酒】？” 【說】【著】，【那】【人】【還】【自】【顧】【自】【的】【拉】【開】【椅】【子】【坐】【下】【了】。 【這】【人】【不】【是】【別】【人】，【正】【是】【不】【久】【前】【才】【分】【開】【的】【柳】【無】【?！?，【不】【過】【他】【已】【經】【換】【了】【一】【身】【衣】【服】，【頭】【發】【從】【原】【來】【的】【亂】【蓬】【蓬】【的】【長】【發】【變】【成】【了】【亂】【蓬】【蓬】【的】【短】【發】